Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Midwest Renewable Energy Survey, Rev.03/10/12


Over three-quarters of the States currently have laws promoting renewable energy. In order to find out how Ohio ranks regionally, a survey was made of ten Midwestern and Appalachian states*. The survey examined two questions:

  1. Does renewable energy cost jobs?
  2. Does renewable energy raise electricity rates?

We found the following results:

Iowa has both the highest percentage of renewables and the lowest unemployment rate of the ten states surveyed.

In contrast, Ohio has the smallest amount of renewable energy. We are about average for electricity rates and unemployment.

For the ten states surveyed, electricity rates do not depend on the percentage of renewables.

In contrast, the states, like Iowa, with the most renewables have the lowest unemployment rates.

The Michigan Public Service Commission has tabulated costs for renewables (Report on the implementation of the P.A. 295 renewable energy standard and the cost-effectiveness of the energy standards) . These range from  zero to $3 per month, a tiny fraction of consumers' bills and of the state-to-state differences. In summary, the data do not support the contention that renewable energy destroys jobs and raises electric rates.

Detailed results of the survey are posted at alanpeg@blogspot.com
…...............

* States included are Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky (no renewable law), Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.
Survey Details

The latest data were obtained from reliable web sites. The survey can be criticized, since the renewable data are for the end of 2010. An approximation of more recent data can be obtained from wind energy as of the end of 2011 (AWEA Market Report), since wind comprises most of the renewable energy in the region. The 2011 wind data move Ohio to next-to-last.

List of Displays

1 Rates and Renewables
2. Green Energy Can Reduce Unemployment
3. Green Energy Ratings
4. Best and worst States (in preparation)
5. Preliminary 2011 Results (in preparation)


Display 1: Rates and Renewables

The data below show that there is no relation between the percent of renewables and the cost of electricity for industry.

State
Industrial Rate,
Cents/kWh
(a)
Renewable Electricity, % (b)
Illinois
6.5
2.7
Indiana
6.2
3.0
Iowa
4.9
17.9
Kentucky
5.1
3.0
Michigan
6.9
3.6
Minnesota
6.0
14.0
Missouri
5.3
2.8
Ohio
6.3
0.8
West Virginia
6.2
2.9
Wisconsin
7.2
7.1


(a) US Energy Information Administration: Average Retail Price of Electricity to Ultimate Customers by End-Use Sector, November 2011 and 2010 (2011 is reported in Table above)
(b) US Energy Information Administration; State Electricity Profiles 2010



Display 2. Green Energy Can Reduce Unemployment

The Midwestern states with the most renewable electricity (Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) also have the lowest unemployment rates in the region.


State
Unemployment, %
(a)
Renewable Electricity, % (b)
Illinois
9.8
2.7
Indiana
9.0
3.0
Iowa
5.6
17.9
Kentucky
9.1
3.0
Michigan
9.3
3.6
Minnesota
5.7
14.0
Missouri
8.0
2.8
Ohio
8.1
0.8
West Virginia
7.9
2.9
Wisconsin
7.1
7.1


(a) Bureau of Labor Statistics; Local Area Unemployment Statistics, December, 2011
(b) US Energy Information Administration; State Electricity Profiles 2010


Display 3. Green Energy Ratings


Ohio's green economy ranks about in the middle of all states by 




several measures. The chart 



compares us with comparable states with respect to the use of 




alternative energy (Column a), 


energy conservation (column b), and green jobs (column c).



National Ranking of Green Energy Programs

in Midwestern States





State
Clean Energy
Ranking
(a)
Energy Conservation Ranking (b)
Green Jobs Ranking
(c)
Illinois
12
17
33
Indiana
33
32
32
Iowa
19
11
25
Kentucky
39
37
26
Michigan
14
17
27
Minnesota
8
8
16
Missouri
37
44
22
Ohio
30
24
21
West Virginia
50
44
43
Wisconsin
15
16
8


a) Clean Edge: CA, OR, MA, NY, & CO Top Nation in Clean Energy Leadership, 18 May 2011; includes electricity and transportation.

b) ACEEE: 2011 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard Rankingc)


c)  Brookings Institute: Sizing the Green Economy, 13 July 2011. According to this report Ohio has over 105 thousand green jobs, with an average pay of $39 thousand per year. About 70 percent of these jobs are blue collar.

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Hydraulic Fracturing/Fracking, Pros & Cons


PRO HYDRAULIC FRACTURING


Potential Energy Independence: Fossil fuels extracted domestically can help wean us off of our addiction to foreign oil.

Clean and Economical Fuel: Replacing coal powered plants with natural gas plants and gasoline engines with natural-gas-powered ones could work as part of a plan to reduce greenhouse emissions significantly. Natural gas is also proving to be a cheap source of energy.
Local Economic Benefits: Extraction of fossil fuels is already a major source of employment in the U.S. Increased drilling will lead to more jobs. In addition,leases and royalties put money into economically-depressed areas.

Buys Time To Develop Renewable Energy : Natural Gas can serve as a bridge fuel to a 21st century energy economy that relies on efficiency, renewable sources, and low-carbon fossil fuels.

CON FRACKING


Severe Water and Air Pollution: Extracting natural gas by fracking leads to major pollution of wells. This has caused numerous cases of severe health problems for both humans and animals.

Fracking Has Led To Earthquakes: Several earthquakes, including eleven in Youngstown, have been linked either to the hydraulic fracturing process or to wells for disposal of spent fracking fluids.

Requires Large Amounts Of Water: The fracking process can require around large amounts of water. Fracking is exempt from the Safe Drinking Water Act of 2005, thus allowing companies to conceal the chemicals used in the process. Concerns about these chemicals include carcinogens and radioactive waste.

Large Clean-up Costs : Drilling leaves behind damaged roads, damaged land, and an unsafe environment. Real estate values plummet.